<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.1 (Ruby 3.2.2) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-04" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.18.2 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="New TCP and IPv6 EH IPFIX IEs">Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information Elements</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-04"/>
    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair">
      <organization>Orange</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Benoit Claise">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <email>benoit.claise@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2023" month="October" day="19"/>
    <area>Operations and Management</area>
    <workgroup>OPSAWG</workgroup>
    <keyword>IPFIX</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 60?>

<t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements (IEs) to solve some issues with existing ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions IPFIX IEs, especially the ability to export any observed IPv6 extension headers or TCP options.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>Discussion Venues</name>
      <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the
    Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list (opsawg@ietf.org),
    which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/"/>.</t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
    <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/ipfix-tcpoptions-and-v6eh"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 64?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements (IEs) to solve a set of issues encountered with the specifications of ipv6ExtensionHeaders (to export IPv6 extension headers) and tcpOptions (to export TCP options) IEs. More details about these issues are provided in the following sub-sections.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-eh-issues">
        <name>Issues with ipv6ExtensionHeaders Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of ipv6ExtensionHeaders IPFIX IE does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Cover the full extension headers range (<xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>).</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify the procedure to follow when all bits are exhausted.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify a means to export the order and the number of occurences of a given extension header.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to automatically update the IANA IPFIX registry (<xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>) when a new value is assigned in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>. Only a frozen set of extension headers can be exported using the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify whether the exported values match the full enclosed values or only up to a limit imposed by hardware or software (e.g., <xref section="1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>).</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to report the length of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Explain the reasoning for reporting values which do no correspond to extension headers (e.g., "Unknown Layer 4 header" or "Payload compression header").</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-eh"/> addresses these issues.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-tcp-issues">
        <name>Issues with tcpOptions Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of tcpOptions IPFIX IE does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Describe how any observed TCP option in a Flow can be exported using IPFIX. Only TCP options having a kind =&lt; 63 can be exported in a tcpOptions IPFIX IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Support means to report the observed Experimental Identifiers (ExIDs) that are carried in shared TCP options (kind=253 or 254) <xref target="RFC6994"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-tcp"/> addresses these issues.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="conventions-and-definitions">
      <name>Conventions and Definitions</name>
      <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <?line -18?>

<t>This document uses the IPFIX-specific terminology (Information Element, Template,
   Collector,  Data Record, Flow, Flow Record, Exporting Process,
   Collecting Process, etc.) defined in
   <xref section="2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>. As in <xref target="RFC7011"/>, these IPFIX-specific terms
   have the first letter of a word capitalized.</t>
      <t>Also, the document uses the terms defined in <xref target="RFC8200"/> and <xref target="RFC9293"/>.</t>
      <t>In addition, the document makes use of the following term:</t>
      <dl>
        <dt>Extension header chain:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Refers to the chain of extension headers that are present in an IPv6 packet.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt/>
        <dd>
          <t>This term should not be confused with the IPv6 header chain, which includes
the IPv6 header, zero or more IPv6 extension headers,
and zero or a single Upper-Layer Header.</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-eh">
      <name>Information Elements for IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
      <t>The definition of the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE is updated in <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/> to address some of the issues listed in <xref target="sec-eh-issues"/>. Because some of these limitations can't be addressed by simple updates to ipv6ExtensionHeaders, this section specifies a set of new IEs to address all the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE limitations.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-v6full">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD1</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>IPv6 extension headers observed in packets of this Flow. The
information is encoded in a set of bit fields.  For each IPv6
extension header, there is a bit in this set. The bit is set to 1 if
any observed packet of this Flow contains the corresponding IPv6
extension header.  Otherwise, if no observed packet of this Flow
contained the respective IPv6 extension header, the value of the
corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The IPv6 extension header associated with each bit is provided in
[NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY]. Bit 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit
in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE while bit 254 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the IE.
In doing so, few octets will be needed to encode common IPv6 extension headers when observed in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The "No Next Header" (59) value is used if there is no upper-layer header in an IPv6 packet.
Even if the value is not considered as an extension header as such, the corresponding
bit is set in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE whenever that value is encountered in the Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Several extension header chains may be observed in a Flow. These extension headers
may be aggregated in one single ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element or
be exported in separate ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IEs, one for each extension header chain.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>This Information Element <bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14> be exported if ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element is also present.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned bits to each IPv6 extension header type in [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY].</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="IANA-EH"/> for assigned extension header types.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <ul empty="true">
          <li>
            <t>Note to the RFC Editor: Please replace [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] with the link to the "ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits" registry created by <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/>.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6count">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD2</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>As per <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>, IPv6 nodes must accept and attempt to process extension headers in
occurring any number of times in the same packet. This Information Element echoes the
order of extension headers and number of consecutive occurrences of the same extension header type in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If several extension header chains are observed in a Flow, each header
chain <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The same extension header type may appear several times in an ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element.
For example, if an IPv6 packet of a Flow includes a Hop-by-Hop Options header, a Destination Options header, a Fragment header,
and Destination Options header, the ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element will report two counts of the Destination Options header: the occurrences
that are observed before the Fragment header and the occurrences right after the Fragment header.</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                                  LSB
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ...
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
 |  EH Type#1    |   Count       |...|  EH Type#n      |   Count       |
 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        <dl>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned64</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned IPv6 extension header types in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6limit">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD3</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "true", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
headers information (e.g., ipv6ExtensionHeaderFull or ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount) does
not match the full enclosed extension headers, but only up to a
limit that is typically set by hardware or software.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "false", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
header information matches the full enclosed extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>boolean</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>default</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8883"/> for an example of IPv6 packets processing due to limits on extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6aggr">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD4</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>In theory, there are no limits on the number of IPv6 extension headers that may
be present in a packet other than the path MTU. However, it was regularly
reported that IPv6 packets with extension headers are often dropped in the Internet.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>As discussed in <xref section="1.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>, some hardware devices implement
a parsing buffer of a fixed size to process packets, including all the headers.
When the aggregate length of headers of an IPv6 packet exceeds that size, the packet will be discarded or deferred to a slow path.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE is used to report, in octets, the length of
an extension header chain observed in a Flow. The length is the sum of the length of all extension headers of the chain. Exporting such information may help identifying root causes of performance degradation, including packet drops.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Units:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octets</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9098"/> for an overview of operational implications of IPv6 packets with extension headerss.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-tcp">
      <name>Information Elements for TCP Options</name>
      <t>The definition of the tcpOptions IE is updated in <xref target="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes"/> to address some of the issues listed in <xref target="sec-tcp-issues"/>. Because some of these limitations can't be addressed by simple updates to tcpOptions, this section specifies a set of new IEs to address all the tcpOptions IE limitations.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-tcpfull">
        <name>tcpOptionsFull Information Element</name>
        <t>This section specifies a new IE to cover the full TCP options range.</t>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpOptionsFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD5</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TCP options in packets of this Flow.  The information is encoded
    in a set of bit fields.  For each TCP option, there is a bit in
    this set.  The bit is set to 1 if any observed packet of this Flow
    contains the corresponding TCP option.  Otherwise, if no observed
    packet of this Flow contained the respective TCP option, the value
    of the corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Options are mapped to bits according to their option numbers.
    Option number X is mapped to bit position "254 - X". This approach allows
    an observer to export any observed TCP option even if it does support
    that option and without requiring updating a mapping table.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the assigned TCP option kinds at <xref target="IANA-TCP"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID16 Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID16</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD6</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Observed Expermients IDs (ExIDs) in a shared
    TCP option (Kind=253 or 254)  in a Flow.  The information is encoded in a set of
    16-bit fields.  Each 16-bit field carries an observed 2-byte ExID in a
    shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octetArray</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See assigned ExIDs at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex32">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID32 Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD7</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Observed Expermients IDs (ExIDs) in a shared
TCP option (Kind=253 or 254)  in a Flow.  The information is encoded in a set of
32-bit fields. Each 32-bit field carries an observed 4-byte ExID in a
shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octetArray</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See assigned ExIDs at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="operational-considerations">
      <name>Operational Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="op-eh">
        <name>IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t>The value of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull and ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IEs should be encoded in fewer octets as per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
        <t>If an implementation determines that it includes an extension header that it does no support, then the exact observed code of that extension header will be echoed in the ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount IE (<xref target="sec-v6count"/>). How an implementation disambiguates between unknown upper-layer protocols vs. extension headers is not IPFIX-specific. Readers may refer, for example, to <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/> for a behavior of an intermediate nodes that encounters an unknown Next Header type. It is out of the scope of this document to discuss those considerations.</t>
        <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit IE (<xref target="sec-v6limit"/>) may or may not be present when the ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE (<xref target="sec-v6aggr"/>) is also present as these IEs are targeting distinct properties of extension headers handling.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="op-tcp">
        <name>TCP Options</name>
        <t>The value of tcpOptionsFull IE should be encoded in fewer octets as per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
        <t>If a TCP Flow contains packets with a mix of 2-byte and 4-byte Experiment IDs, the same Template Record is used with both tcpSharedOptionExID16 and tcpSharedOptionExID32 IEs.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-examples">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <section anchor="ipv6-extension-headers">
        <name>IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t>This section provides few examples to illustrate the use of some IEs defined in the document.</t>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh1"/> provides an example of reported values in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which only
the     IPv6 Destination Options header is observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 1.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh1">
          <name>A First Example of Extension Headers</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                 20     ...  25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 ...6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 9 0 1 2 3 4
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh2"/> provides another example of reported values in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which
the     IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options, Routing, and Destination Options headers are observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 19.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh2">
          <name>A Second Example of Extension Headers</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                  20     ...  25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 ... 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 9 0 1 2 3 4
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|1|0|0|1|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
      <section anchor="tcp-options">
        <name>TCP Options</name>
        <t>Given TCP kind allocation practices and the option mapping defined in <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/>, fewer octers are likely to be used for
Flows with common TCP options.</t>
        <t><xref target="ex-tcp1"/> shows an example of reported values in a tcpOptionsFull IE for a TCP Flow in which End of Option List, Maximum Segment Size, and Window Scale options are observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the tcpOptionsFull IE will be set to 15.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-tcp1">
          <name>First Example of TCP Options</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                        LSB
                     1                   2     ...  25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ... 9 0 1 2 3 4
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|1|1|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>IPFIX security considerations are discussed in <xref section="11" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>. This document does not add new security considerations for exporting IEs other than those already discussed in <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <t>This document requests IANA to add the following new IPFIX IEs to the IANA IPFIX registry <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>:</t>
      <table>
        <name>New IPFIX Information Elements</name>
        <thead>
          <tr>
            <th align="left">Value</th>
            <th align="left">Name</th>
            <th align="left">Reference</th>
          </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD1</td>
            <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-v6full"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD2</td>
            <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-v6count"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD3</td>
            <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderLimit</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-v6limit"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD4</td>
            <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-v6aggr"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD5</td>
            <td align="left">tcpOptionsFull</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD6</td>
            <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID16</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-ex"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <td align="left">TBD7</td>
            <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID32</td>
            <td align="left">
              <xref target="sec-ex32"/> of This-Document</td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="IANA-IPFIX" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-EH" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xhtml#ipv6-parameters-1">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters, IPv6 Extension Header Types</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-parameters-1">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Option Kind Numbers</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP-EXIDs" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-exids">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8200">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification</title>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering"/>
            <author fullname="R. Hinden" initials="R." surname="Hinden"/>
            <date month="July" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). It obsoletes RFC 2460.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="86"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8200"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8200"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6994">
          <front>
            <title>Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options</title>
            <author fullname="J. Touch" initials="J." surname="Touch"/>
            <date month="August" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how the experimental TCP option codepoints can concurrently support multiple TCP extensions, even within the same connection, using a new IANA TCP experiment identifier. This approach is robust to experiments that are not registered and to those that do not use this sharing mechanism. It is recommended for all new TCP options that use these codepoints.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6994"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6994"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7011">
          <front>
            <title>Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, which serves as a means for transmitting Traffic Flow information over the network. In order to transmit Traffic Flow information from an Exporting Process to a Collecting Process, a common representation of flow data and a standard means of communicating them are required. This document describes how the IPFIX Data and Template Records are carried over a number of transport protocols from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX Collecting Process. This document obsoletes RFC 5101.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="77"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7011"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7011"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9293">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)</title>
            <author fullname="W. Eddy" initials="W." role="editor" surname="Eddy"/>
            <date month="August" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport-layer protocol in the Internet protocol stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="7"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9293"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9293"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7012">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the data types and management policy for the information model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. This information model is maintained as the IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry, the initial contents of which were defined by RFC 5102. This information model is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although this model was developed for the IPFIX protocol, it is defined in an open way that allows it to be easily used in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. This document obsoletes RFC 5102.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7012"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7012"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC8883">
          <front>
            <title>ICMPv6 Errors for Discarding Packets Due to Processing Limits</title>
            <author fullname="T. Herbert" initials="T." surname="Herbert"/>
            <date month="September" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Network nodes may discard packets if they are unable to process protocol headers of packets due to processing constraints or limits. When such packets are dropped, the sender receives no indication, so it cannot take action to address the cause of discarded packets. This specification defines several new ICMPv6 errors that can be sent by a node that discards packets because it is unable to process the protocol headers. A node that receives such an ICMPv6 error may use the information to diagnose packet loss and may modify what it sends in future packets to avoid subsequent packet discards.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8883"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8883"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes">
          <front>
            <title>Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry</title>
            <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair">
              <organization>Orange</organization>
            </author>
            <author fullname="Benoît Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise">
              <organization>Huawei</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="17" month="October" year="2023"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This document provides simple fixes to the IANA IP Flow Information
   Export (IPFIX) registry.  Specifically, this document provides
   updates to fix a shortcoming in the description of some Information
   Elements (IE), updates to ensure a consistent structure when calling
   an existing IANA registry, and updates to fix broken pointers, orphan
   section references, etc.  The updates are also meant to bringing some
   consistency among the entries of the registry.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-03"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9098">
          <front>
            <title>Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers</title>
            <author fullname="F. Gont" initials="F." surname="Gont"/>
            <author fullname="N. Hilliard" initials="N." surname="Hilliard"/>
            <author fullname="G. Doering" initials="G." surname="Doering"/>
            <author fullname="W. Kumari" initials="W." surname="Kumari"/>
            <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/>
            <author fullname="W. Liu" initials="W." surname="Liu"/>
            <date month="September" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document summarizes the operational implications of IPv6 extension headers specified in the IPv6 protocol specification (RFC 8200) and attempts to analyze reasons why packets with IPv6 extension headers are often dropped in the public Internet.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9098"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9098"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 476?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Thanks to Paul Aitken and Eric Vyncke for the review and comments.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
