<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rfc2629.xslt" ?>
<!-- generated by https://github.com/cabo/kramdown-rfc version 1.7.17 (Ruby 3.3.1) -->
<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" ipr="trust200902" docName="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-16" category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" tocInclude="true" sortRefs="true" symRefs="true" version="3">
  <!-- xml2rfc v2v3 conversion 3.21.0 -->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="New TCP and IPv6 EH IPFIX IEs">Extended TCP Options and IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Information Elements</title>
    <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-16"/>
    <author fullname="Mohamed Boucadair">
      <organization>Orange</organization>
      <address>
        <email>mohamed.boucadair@orange.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Benoit Claise">
      <organization>Huawei</organization>
      <address>
        <email>benoit.claise@huawei.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date year="2024" month="June" day="24"/>
    <area>Operations and Management</area>
    <workgroup>OPSAWG</workgroup>
    <keyword>IPFIX</keyword>
    <abstract>
      <?line 68?>

<t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements (IEs) to solve issues with existing ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions IPFIX IEs, especially the ability to export any observed IPv6 extension headers or TCP options.</t>
    </abstract>
    <note removeInRFC="true">
      <name>Discussion Venues</name>
      <t>Discussion of this document takes place on the
    Operations and Management Area Working Group Working Group mailing list (opsawg@ietf.org),
    which is archived at <eref target="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/"/>.</t>
      <t>Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
    <eref target="https://github.com/boucadair/ipfix-tcpoptions-and-v6eh"/>.</t>
    </note>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <?line 72?>

<section anchor="introduction">
      <name>Introduction</name>
      <t>This document specifies new IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) <xref target="RFC7011"/> Information Elements (IEs) to solve a set of issues encountered with the specifications of ipv6ExtensionHeaders (to export IPv6 extension headers) and tcpOptions (to export TCP options) IEs <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>. More details about these issues are provided in the following sub-sections.</t>
      <section anchor="sec-eh-issues">
        <name>Issues with ipv6ExtensionHeaders Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IPFIX IE (64) does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Cover the full extension headers' range defined in the IPv6 specification (<xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>).</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify the procedure to follow when all bits are exhausted.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify a means to export the order and the number of occurrences of a given extension header.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to automatically update the IANA IPFIX registry (<xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>) when a new value is assigned in the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry <xref target="IANA-EH"/>. Only a frozen set of extension headers can be exported using the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE. For example, the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE can't report some IPv6 EHs, specifically EHs for Host Identity Protocol (139), Shim6 Protocol (140) or extension headers for experimentation and testing.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify whether the exported values match the full enclosed values or only up to a limit imposed by hardware or software (e.g., <xref section="1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>). Note that some implementations may not be able to export all observed extension headers in a Flow because of a hardware or software limit (see, e.g., <xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-eh-limits"/>). The specification of the ipv6ExtensionHeaders Information Element does not discuss whether it covers all enclosed extension headers or only up to a limit.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to report the length of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Explain the reasoning for reporting values which do not correspond to extension headers (e.g., "Unknown Layer 4 header" or "Payload compression header").</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Specify how to report extension header chains or aggregate extension headers length.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-eh"/> addresses these issues.</t>
        <t>This specification deprecates the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IPFIX IE in favor of the new IEs defined in this document.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-tcp-issues">
        <name>Issues with tcpOptions Information Element</name>
        <t>The specification of the tcpOptions IPFIX IE (209) does not:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Describe how some observed TCP options in a Flow can be exported using IPFIX. Only TCP options having a Kind &lt;= 63 can be exported in a tcpOptions IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Allow reporting the observed Experiment Identifiers (ExIDs) that are carried in shared Experimental TCP options (Kind=253 or 254) <xref target="RFC6994"/>.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Optimize the encoding.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t><xref target="sec-tcp"/> addresses these issues.</t>
        <t>This specification deprecates the tcpOptions IE in favor of the new IEs defined in this document.</t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="conventions-and-definitions">
      <name>Conventions and Definitions</name>
      <t>The key words "<bcp14>MUST</bcp14>", "<bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>REQUIRED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHALL
NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD</bcp14>", "<bcp14>SHOULD NOT</bcp14>", "<bcp14>RECOMMENDED</bcp14>", "<bcp14>NOT RECOMMENDED</bcp14>",
"<bcp14>MAY</bcp14>", and "<bcp14>OPTIONAL</bcp14>" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they
appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
      <?line -18?>

<t>This document uses the IPFIX-specific terminology (Information Element, Template Record,
   Flow, etc.) defined in
   <xref section="2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>. As in the base IPFIX specification <xref target="RFC7011"/>, these IPFIX-specific terms
   have the first letter of a word capitalized.</t>
      <t>Also, the document uses the terms defined in IPv6 <xref target="RFC8200"/> and TCP <xref target="RFC9293"/> specifications.</t>
      <t>In addition, the document makes use of the following term:</t>
      <dl>
        <dt>Extension header chain:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Refers to the chain of extension headers that are present in an IPv6 packet.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt/>
        <dd>
          <t>This term should not be confused with the IPv6 header chain, which includes
the IPv6 header, zero or more IPv6 extension headers,
and zero or a single Upper-Layer Header.</t>
        </dd>
        <dt>Flow with varying extension header chain:</dt>
        <dd>
          <t>Refers to a Flow where distinct extension header chains are observed. Concretely, different packets in such a Flow will have a different sequence of extension header type codes.</t>
        </dd>
      </dl>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-eh">
      <name>Information Elements for IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
      <section anchor="sec-v6ehtype">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderType Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderType</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD1</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Type of an IPv6 extension header observed in packets of this Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned8</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry at <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6ehcount">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD2</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>The number of consecutive occurrences of the same extension header type in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The type of the extension header is provided in the ipv6ExtensionHeaderType Information Element.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned8</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>totalCounter</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry at <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6full">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD3</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>IPv6 extension headers observed in packets of this Flow. The
information is encoded in a set of bit fields.  For each IPv6
extension header, there is a bit in this set. The bit is set to 1 if
any observed packet of this Flow contains the corresponding IPv6
extension header.  Otherwise, if no observed packet of this Flow
contains the respective IPv6 extension header, the value of the
corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The IPv6 extension header associated with each bit is provided in
[NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY]. Bit 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit
in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE while bit 255 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the IE.
In doing so, few octets will be needed to encode common IPv6 extension headers when observed in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The "No Next Header" (59) value (<xref section="4.7" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>) is used if there is no upper-layer header in an IPv6 packet.
Even if the value is not considered as an extension header as such, the corresponding
bit is set in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE whenever that value is encountered in the Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Extension headers observed in a Flow with varying extension header chain <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be grouped in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element if the ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList Information Element is also present.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If the ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList Information Element is not present, then extension headers observed in a Flow with varying extension header chain
<bcp14>MAY</bcp14> be grouped in one single ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element or be exported in separate ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IEs, one for each extension header chain.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull Information Element <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> be exported if ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList Information Element is also present because of the overlapping scopes between these two IEs.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The value of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE may be encoded in fewer octets per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned256</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits registry at [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY].</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry at <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
        <ul empty="true">
          <li>
            <t>Note to the RFC Editor: Please replace [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] with the link to the "ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits" registry (<xref target="sec-iana-eh"/>).</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6count">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD4</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>As per <xref section="4.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/>, IPv6 nodes must accept and attempt to process extension headers
occurring any number of times in the same packet. This Information Element echoes the
order of extension headers and number of consecutive occurrences of the same extension header type in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>This Information Element is a subTemplateList of ipv6ExtensionHeaderType and ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount Information Elements.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Each header chain in Flow with varying extension header chain <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate  IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The same extension header type may appear several times in an ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList Information Element.
For example, if an IPv6 packet of a Flow includes a Hop-by-Hop Options header, a Destination Options header, a Fragment header,
and Destination Options header, the ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList Information Element will report:</t>
            <ul spacing="normal">
              <li>
                <t>the count of Hop-by-Hop Options header,</t>
              </li>
              <li>
                <t>the occurrences of the Destination Options header that are observed before the Fragment header,</t>
              </li>
              <li>
                <t>the occurrences of the Fragment header, and</t>
              </li>
              <li>
                <t>the occurrences of the Destination Options header that are observed right after the Fragment header.</t>
              </li>
            </ul>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If an implementation determines that an observed packet of a Flow includes an extension header (including an extension header that it does not support), then the exact observed code of that extension header <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be echoed in the ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList IE. How an implementation disambiguates between unknown upper-layer protocols vs. extension headers is not IPFIX-specific. Refer, for example, to <xref section="2.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/> for a behavior of an intermediate node that encounters an unknown Next Header type.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>subTemplateList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>list</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry at <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6limit">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD5</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "false", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
headers information (e.g., ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull or ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList) does
not match the full enclosed extension headers, but only up to a
limit that is typically set by hardware or software.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>When set to "true", this Information Element indicates that the exported extension
header information matches the full enclosed extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>boolean</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>default</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8883"/> for an example of IPv6 packet processing due to limits on extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6aggr">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD6</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>In theory, there are no limits on the number of IPv6 extension headers that may
be present in a packet other than the path MTU. However, it was regularly
reported that IPv6 packets with extension headers are often dropped in the Internet.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>As discussed in <xref section="1.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8883"/>, some hardware devices implement
a parsing buffer of a fixed size to process packets, including all the headers.
When the aggregate length of headers of an IPv6 packet exceeds that size, the packet will be discarded or deferred to a slow path.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE is used to report, in octets, the length of
an extension header chain observed in a Flow.  The length is the sum of the length of all extension headers of the chain. Exporting such information might help identifying root causes of performance degradation, including packet drops.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Each header chain length of a Flow with varying extension header chain <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Units:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>octets</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref section="4" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9098"/> for an overview of operational implications of IPv6 packets with extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-v6chain-list">
        <name>ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD7</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This Information Element is used to report the chains and their length as observed in a Flow with varying extension header chain.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>This Information Element is a subTemplateList of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull and ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength Information Elements.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>If several extension header chains are observed in a Flow, each header
chain <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be exported in a separate ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList IE.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>subTemplateList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>list</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the IPv6 Extension Header Types registry at <xref target="IANA-EH"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC8200"/> for the general definition of IPv6 extension headers.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-tcp">
      <name>Information Elements for TCP Options</name>
      <section anchor="sec-tcpfull">
        <name>tcpOptionsFull Information Element</name>
        <t>This section specifies a new IE to cover the full TCP options range.</t>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpOptionsFull</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD8</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TCP options in packets of this Flow.  The information is encoded
    in a set of bit fields.  For each TCP option, there is a bit in
    this set.  The bit is set to 1 if any observed packet of this Flow
    contains the corresponding TCP option.  Otherwise, if no observed
    packet of this Flow contains the respective TCP option, the value
    of the corresponding bit is 0.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>Options are mapped to bits according to their option numbers.
TCP option Kind 0 corresponds to the least-significant bit
in the tcpOptionsFull IE while Kind 255 corresponds to the most-significant bit of the IE. This approach allows
an observer to export any observed TCP option even if it does support
that option and without requiring updating a mapping table.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The value of tcpOptionsFull IE may be encoded in fewer octets per the guidelines in <xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>The presence of tcpSharedOptionExID16List or tcpSharedOptionExID32List IEs is an indication that  a shared TCP option (Kind=253 or 254) is observed in a Flow. The presence of tcpSharedOptionExID16List or tcpSharedOptionExID32List IEs takes precedence over setting the corresponding bits in the tcpOptionsFull IE for the same Flow. In order to optimize the use of the reduced-size encoding in the presence of tcpSharedOptionExID16List or tcpSharedOptionExID32List IEs, the Exporter <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> set to 1 the shared TCP options (Kind=253 or 254) flags of the tcpOptionsFull IE that is reported for the same Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned256</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>flags</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the TCP Option Kind Numbers registry at <xref target="IANA-TCP"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-tcpExID16">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID16  Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID16</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD9</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Reports an observed 2-byte ExID in a shared
TCP option (Kind=253 or 254) in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned16</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs) registry at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-tcpExID32">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID32 Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD10</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Reports an observed 4-byte ExID in a shared
TCP option (Kind=253 or 254) in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>unsigned32</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>identifier</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs) registry at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID16List Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID16List</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD11</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Reports observed 2-byte ExIDs in shared
TCP options (Kind=253 or 254) in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>A basicList of tcpSharedOptionExID16 Information Elements in which each tcpSharedOptionExID16 Information Element carries an observed 2-byte ExID in a
shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>basicList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>list</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs) registry at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-ex32">
        <name>tcpSharedOptionExID32List Information Element</name>
        <dl>
          <dt>Name:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>tcpSharedOptionExID32List</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>ElementID:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>TBD12</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Description:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>Reports observed 4-byte ExIDs in shared
TCP options (Kind=253 or 254) in a Flow.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>A basicList of tcpSharedOptionExID32 Information Elements in which each tcpSharedOptionExID32 Information Element carries an observed 4-byte ExID in a
shared option.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Abstract Data Type:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>basicList</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Data Type Semantics:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>list</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Additional Information:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>See the TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs) registry at <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC9293"/> for the general definition of TCP options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt/>
          <dd>
            <t>See <xref target="RFC6994"/> for the shared use of experimental TCP Options.</t>
          </dd>
          <dt>Reference:</dt>
          <dd>
            <t>This-Document</t>
          </dd>
        </dl>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="operational-considerations">
      <name>Operational Considerations</name>
      <t>Implementations of tcpSharedOptionExID16, tcpSharedOptionExID32, tcpSharedOptionExID16List, and tcpSharedOptionExID32List IEs are assumed to be provided with a list of valid ExIDs <xref target="IANA-TCP-EXIDs"/>. How that list is maintained is implementation-specific. Absent that list, an implementation can't autonomously determine whether an ExID is present and, if so, whether it is 2- or 4-byte length.</t>
      <t>If a TCP Flow contains packets with a mix of 2-byte and 4-byte ExIDs, the same Template Record is used with both tcpSharedOptionExID16 and tcpSharedOptionExID32 IEs.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="sec-examples">
      <name>Examples</name>
      <t>This section provides a few examples to illustrate the use of some IEs defined in this document.</t>
      <section anchor="ipv6-extension-headers">
        <name>IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh1"/> provides an example of EH/bit mappings in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which only
the     IPv6 Destination Options (0) header is observed. The bits are set following the table provided in <xref target="sec-initial"/>.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh1">
          <name>A First Example of EH/Bit Mappings in the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                      LSB
                     1                          25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|0|0|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>The leading zeros are dropped per the reduced-size encoding guidance. One octet is thus sufficient to send these observed options on the wire. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 0x01 (<xref target="ex-eh1-wire"/>).</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh1-wire">
          <name>A First Example of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE with Reduced-size Encoding</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB           LSB
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t><xref target="ex-eh2"/> provides another example of reported values in an ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE for an IPv6 Flow in which
the     Destination Options (0), IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options (1), and Routing (5) headers are observed. One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE will be set to 0x23.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh2">
          <name>A Second Example of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE with Reduced-size Encoding</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB           LSB
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|1|0|0|0|1|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
        <t>Let us now consider an IPv6 Flow in which the following EH chain is observed: Routing (5), Mobility (7), and Authentication (9) header. <xref target="ex-eh3"/>
shows the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE (0x02A0) to reprot this individual chain.</t>
        <figure anchor="ex-eh3">
          <name>An Example of ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE Reported for an Extension Header Chain</name>
          <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                          LSB
                     1
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|1|0|1|0|1|0|0|0|0|0|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
        </figure>
      </section>
      <section anchor="tcp-options">
        <name>TCP Options</name>
        <section anchor="reduced-size-encoding">
          <name>Reduced-size Encoding</name>
          <t>Given TCP Kind allocation practices and the option mapping defined in <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/>, fewer octets are likely to be used for Flows with common TCP options.</t>
          <t><xref target="ex-tcp1"/> shows an example of Kind/bit mappings in a tcpOptionsFull IE for a TCP Flow in which End of Option List (0), Maximum Segment Size (2), and Window Scale (3) options are observed.</t>
          <figure anchor="ex-tcp1">
            <name>An Example of TCP Options / Bit Mappings in a tcpOptionsFull IE</name>
            <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB                                                      LSB
                     1                          25
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|   |0|0|0|0|1|1|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
          <t>One octet is sufficient to report these observed options. Concretely, the tcpOptionsFull IE will be set to 0x0D (<xref target="ex-tcp1-wire"/>).</t>
          <figure anchor="ex-tcp1-wire">
            <name>An Example of tcpOptionsFull IE with Reduced-size Encdoing</name>
            <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
MSB           LSB
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0|0|0|0|1|1|0|1|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>
        <section anchor="shared-options">
          <name>Shared Options</name>
          <t>Let us consider a TCP Flow in which shared options with ExIDs 0x0348 (HOST_ID) <xref target="RFC7974"/>, 0x454E     (TCP-ENO) <xref target="RFC8547"/>, and 0xE2D4C3D9  (Shared Memory communications over RMDA protocol)       <xref target="RFC7609"/> are observed. <xref target="ex-tcp2"/> shows an excerpt of the Data Set encoding with a focus on the tcpSharedOptionExID16 and tcpSharedOptionExID32 IEs. The meaning of the fields is defined in <xref target="RFC6313"/>.</t>
          <figure anchor="ex-tcp2">
            <name>Example of TCP Shared IEs</name>
            <artwork align="center"><![CDATA[
 MSB                                                          LSB
 0                   1                   2                   3
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
:                           ...                                 :
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      255      |        List Length = 9        |semantic=allof |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|tcpSharedOptionExID16 = TBD9   |         Field Length = 2      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|              0x0348           |             0x454E            |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|      255      |        List Length = 9        |semantic=allof |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|tcpSharedOptionExID32 = TBD10  |         Field Length = 4      |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|                           0xE2D4C3D9                          |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
:                           ...                                 :
]]></artwork>
          </figure>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="security-considerations">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
      <t>IPFIX security considerations are discussed in <xref section="11" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>.</t>
      <t>ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength and ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit IEs can be exploited by an unauthorized observer as a means to deduce the processing capabilities of nodes. <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/> discusses the required measures to guarantee the integrity and confidentiality of the exported information.</t>
      <t>This document does not add new security considerations for exporting IEs other than those already discussed in <xref section="8" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7012"/>.</t>
    </section>
    <section anchor="iana-considerations">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <section anchor="deprecate-ipv6extensionheaders-and-tcpoptions-information-elements">
        <name>Deprecate ipv6ExtensionHeaders and tcpOptions Information Elements</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to update the "IPFIX Information Elements" registry under the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/> as follows:</t>
        <ul spacing="normal">
          <li>
            <t>Update the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE (64) entry by marking it as deprecated in favor of the ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull IE defined in this document. This note should also be echoed in the "Additional Information" of the ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE.</t>
          </li>
          <li>
            <t>Update the tcpOptions IE (209) entry by marking it as deprecated in favor of the tcpOptionsFull IE defined in this document. This note should also be echoed in the "Additional Information" of the tcpOptions IE.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t>IANA is also requested to update the reference of ipv6ExtensionHeaders IE (64) and tcpOptions IE (209) to point to this document.</t>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ipfix-information-elements">
        <name>IPFIX Information Elements</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to add the following new IPFIX IEs to the "IPFIX Information Elements" registry under the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>:</t>
        <table anchor="iana-new-ies">
          <name>New IPFIX Information Elements</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Value</th>
              <th align="left">Name</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD1</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeader</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6ehtype"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD2</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderCount</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6ehcount"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD3</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersFull</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6full"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD4</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderTypeCountList</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6count"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD5</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersLimit</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6limit"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD6</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeadersChainLength</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6aggr"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD7</td>
              <td align="left">ipv6ExtensionHeaderChainLengthList</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-v6chain-list"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD8</td>
              <td align="left">tcpOptionsFull</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-tcpfull"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD9</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID16</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-tcpExID16"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD10</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID32</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-tcpExID32"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD11</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID16List</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-ex"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD12</td>
              <td align="left">tcpSharedOptionExID32List</td>
              <td align="left">
                <xref target="sec-ex32"/> of This-Document</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </section>
      <section anchor="ipfix-information-element-data-type">
        <name>IPFIX Information Element Data Type</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to add the following new abstract data type to the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" registry under the "IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>:</t>
        <table anchor="iana-new-dt">
          <name>New IPFIX Information Element Data Type</name>
          <thead>
            <tr>
              <th align="left">Value</th>
              <th align="left">Description</th>
              <th align="left">Reference</th>
            </tr>
          </thead>
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td align="left">TBD10</td>
              <td align="left">unsigned256</td>
              <td align="left">This-Document</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <section anchor="unsigned256">
          <name>unsigned256</name>
          <t>The type "unsigned256" represents a non-negative integer value in the
range of '0' to '2^256 - 1'. Similar to <xref section="6.1.1" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>, this type <bcp14>MUST</bcp14> be encoded using the default canonical format in network byte order.</t>
          <t>Reduced-Size encoding (<xref section="6.2" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC7011"/>) applies to this data type. The reduction in size can be to any number of octets smaller than the unsigned256 type if the data value still fits, i.e., so that only leading zeroes are dropped.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
      <section anchor="sec-iana-eh">
        <name>IPFIX Subregistry for IPv6 Extension Headers</name>
        <t>This document requests IANA to create a new registry entitled "ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits" under the IANA IPFIX registry group <xref target="IANA-IPFIX"/>.</t>
        <t>When a new code is assigned to an IPv6 EH in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>, the next available free bit is selected by IANA for this EH from "ipv6ExtensionHeaders Bits" registry and the registry is updated with the details that mirror the assigned EH. The "Label" mirrors the "keyword" of an EH as indicated in <xref target="IANA-Protocols"/>, while the "Protocol Number" mirrors the "Protocol Number" in <xref target="IANA-EH"/>. IANA is requested to add the following note to <xref target="IANA-EH"/>:</t>
        <ul empty="true">
          <li>
            <dl>
              <dt>Note:</dt>
              <dd>
                <t>When a new code is assigned to an IPv6 Extension Header, the next available free bit in [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] is selected for this new Extension Header. [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] is updated accordingly. Modifications to existing registrations must be mirrored in [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY].</t>
              </dd>
            </dl>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <ul empty="true">
          <li>
            <t>Note to the RFC Editor: Please replace [NEW_IPFIX_IPv6EH_SUBREGISTRY] with the link used by IANA for this new registry.</t>
          </li>
        </ul>
        <t>Otherwise, the registration policy for the registry is Expert Review (<xref section="4.5" sectionFormat="of" target="RFC8126"/>). See more details in <xref target="sec-de"/>.</t>
        <section anchor="sec-initial">
          <name>Initial Values</name>
          <t>The initial values of this registry are provided in <xref target="iana-new-eh"/>.</t>
          <table anchor="iana-new-eh">
            <name>Initial Values of the IPv6 Extension Headers IPFIX Subregistry</name>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th align="left">Bit</th>
                <th align="left">Label</th>
                <th align="left">Protocol Number</th>
                <th align="left">Description</th>
                <th align="left">Reference</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">0</td>
                <td align="left">DST</td>
                <td align="left">60</td>
                <td align="left">Destination Options for IPv6</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">1</td>
                <td align="left">HOP</td>
                <td align="left">0</td>
                <td align="left">IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">2</td>
                <td align="left">NoNxt</td>
                <td align="left">59</td>
                <td align="left">No Next Header for IPv6</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">3</td>
                <td align="left">UNK</td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
                <td align="left">Unknown extension header</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">4</td>
                <td align="left">FRA0</td>
                <td align="left">44</td>
                <td align="left">Fragment header - first fragment</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">5</td>
                <td align="left">RH</td>
                <td align="left">43</td>
                <td align="left">Routing header</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">6</td>
                <td align="left">FRA1</td>
                <td align="left">44</td>
                <td align="left">Fragmentation header - not first fragment</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">7</td>
                <td align="left">MOB</td>
                <td align="left">135</td>
                <td align="left">Mobility Header</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">8</td>
                <td align="left">ESP</td>
                <td align="left">50</td>
                <td align="left">Encapsulating Security Payload</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">9</td>
                <td align="left">AH</td>
                <td align="left">51</td>
                <td align="left">Authentication Header</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">10</td>
                <td align="left">HIP</td>
                <td align="left">139</td>
                <td align="left">Host Identity Protocol</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">11</td>
                <td align="left">SHIM6</td>
                <td align="left">140</td>
                <td align="left">Shim6 Protocol</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">12</td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
                <td align="left">253</td>
                <td align="left">Use for experimentation and testing</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">13</td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
                <td align="left">254</td>
                <td align="left">Use for experimentation and testing</td>
                <td align="left">This-Document</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td align="left">14 to 255</td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
                <td align="left">Unassigned</td>
                <td align="left"> </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </section>
        <section anchor="sec-de">
          <name>Guidelines for the Designated Experts</name>
          <t>It is suggested that multiple designated experts be appointed for registry change requests.</t>
          <t>Designated experts are solicited only for changes that are not covered by the automatic mirroring described above. For example, a registration may request two bits for a new EH to cover specific behaviors or uses of that EH.</t>
          <t>Criteria that should be applied by the designated experts include determining whether the proposed registration duplicates existing entries, whether the exception to the automatic mirroring procedure is justified, and whether the registration description is clear and fits the purpose of this registry.</t>
          <t>Within the review period, the designated experts will either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this decision to the IANA. Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful.</t>
        </section>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>
    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references anchor="sec-normative-references">
        <name>Normative References</name>
        <reference anchor="IANA-IPFIX" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml">
          <front>
            <title>IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Entities</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-EH" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xhtml#extension-header">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters, IPv6 Extension Header Types</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-parameters-1">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Option Kind Numbers</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-TCP-EXIDs" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/tcp-parameters/tcp-parameters.xhtml#tcp-exids">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Parameters, TCP Experimental Option Experiment Identifiers (TCP ExIDs)</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="IANA-Protocols" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml">
          <front>
            <title>Protocol Numbers</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7011">
          <front>
            <title>Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Protocol for the Exchange of Flow Information</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol, which serves as a means for transmitting Traffic Flow information over the network. In order to transmit Traffic Flow information from an Exporting Process to a Collecting Process, a common representation of flow data and a standard means of communicating them are required. This document describes how the IPFIX Data and Template Records are carried over a number of transport protocols from an IPFIX Exporting Process to an IPFIX Collecting Process. This document obsoletes RFC 5101.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="77"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7011"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7011"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8200">
          <front>
            <title>Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification</title>
            <author fullname="S. Deering" initials="S." surname="Deering"/>
            <author fullname="R. Hinden" initials="R." surname="Hinden"/>
            <date month="July" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6). It obsoletes RFC 2460.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="86"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8200"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8200"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6994">
          <front>
            <title>Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options</title>
            <author fullname="J. Touch" initials="J." surname="Touch"/>
            <date month="August" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes how the experimental TCP option codepoints can concurrently support multiple TCP extensions, even within the same connection, using a new IANA TCP experiment identifier. This approach is robust to experiments that are not registered and to those that do not use this sharing mechanism. It is recommended for all new TCP options that use these codepoints.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6994"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6994"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC2119">
          <front>
            <title>Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</title>
            <author fullname="S. Bradner" initials="S." surname="Bradner"/>
            <date month="March" year="1997"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>In many standards track documents several words are used to signify the requirements in the specification. These words are often capitalized. This document defines these words as they should be interpreted in IETF documents. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="2119"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC2119"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8174">
          <front>
            <title>Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words</title>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <date month="May" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>RFC 2119 specifies common key words that may be used in protocol specifications. This document aims to reduce the ambiguity by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="14"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8174"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8174"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9293">
          <front>
            <title>Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)</title>
            <author fullname="W. Eddy" initials="W." role="editor" surname="Eddy"/>
            <date month="August" year="2022"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). TCP is an important transport-layer protocol in the Internet protocol stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and growth of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and brings those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling while in the SYN-RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="STD" value="7"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9293"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9293"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC6313">
          <front>
            <title>Export of Structured Data in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="G. Dhandapani" initials="G." surname="Dhandapani"/>
            <author fullname="P. Aitken" initials="P." surname="Aitken"/>
            <author fullname="S. Yates" initials="S." surname="Yates"/>
            <date month="July" year="2011"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document specifies an extension to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol specification in RFC 5101 and the IPFIX information model specified in RFC 5102 to support hierarchical structured data and lists (sequences) of Information Elements in data records. This extension allows definition of complex data structures such as variable-length lists and specification of hierarchical containment relationships between Templates. Finally, the semantics are provided in order to express the relationship among multiple list elements in a structured data record. [STANDARDS-TRACK]</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6313"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC6313"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7012">
          <front>
            <title>Information Model for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)</title>
            <author fullname="B. Claise" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Claise"/>
            <author fullname="B. Trammell" initials="B." role="editor" surname="Trammell"/>
            <date month="September" year="2013"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document defines the data types and management policy for the information model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) protocol. This information model is maintained as the IANA "IPFIX Information Elements" registry, the initial contents of which were defined by RFC 5102. This information model is used by the IPFIX protocol for encoding measured traffic information and information related to the traffic Observation Point, the traffic Metering Process, and the Exporting Process. Although this model was developed for the IPFIX protocol, it is defined in an open way that allows it to be easily used in other protocols, interfaces, and applications. This document obsoletes RFC 5102.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7012"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7012"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8126">
          <front>
            <title>Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs</title>
            <author fullname="M. Cotton" initials="M." surname="Cotton"/>
            <author fullname="B. Leiba" initials="B." surname="Leiba"/>
            <author fullname="T. Narten" initials="T." surname="Narten"/>
            <date month="June" year="2017"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Many protocols make use of points of extensibility that use constants to identify various protocol parameters. To ensure that the values in these fields do not have conflicting uses and to promote interoperability, their allocations are often coordinated by a central record keeper. For IETF protocols, that role is filled by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).</t>
              <t>To make assignments in a given registry prudently, guidance describing the conditions under which new values should be assigned, as well as when and how modifications to existing values can be made, is needed. This document defines a framework for the documentation of these guidelines by specification authors, in order to assure that the provided guidance for the IANA Considerations is clear and addresses the various issues that are likely in the operation of a registry.</t>
              <t>This is the third edition of this document; it obsoletes RFC 5226.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="BCP" value="26"/>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8126"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8126"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
      <references anchor="sec-informative-references">
        <name>Informative References</name>
        <reference anchor="RFC8883">
          <front>
            <title>ICMPv6 Errors for Discarding Packets Due to Processing Limits</title>
            <author fullname="T. Herbert" initials="T." surname="Herbert"/>
            <date month="September" year="2020"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Network nodes may discard packets if they are unable to process protocol headers of packets due to processing constraints or limits. When such packets are dropped, the sender receives no indication, so it cannot take action to address the cause of discarded packets. This specification defines several new ICMPv6 errors that can be sent by a node that discards packets because it is unable to process the protocol headers. A node that receives such an ICMPv6 error may use the information to diagnose packet loss and may modify what it sends in future packets to avoid subsequent packet discards.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8883"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8883"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="I-D.ietf-6man-eh-limits">
          <front>
            <title>Limits on Sending and Processing IPv6 Extension Headers</title>
            <author fullname="Tom Herbert" initials="T." surname="Herbert">
              <organization>SiPanda</organization>
            </author>
            <date day="12" month="June" year="2024"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>   This specification defines various limits that may be applied to
   receiving, sending, and otherwise processing packets that contain
   IPv6 extension headers.  The need for such limits is pragmatic to
   facilitate interoperability amongst hosts and routers in the presence
   of extension headers, thereby increasing the feasibility of
   deployment of extension headers.  The limits described herein
   establish the minimum baseline of support for use of extension
   headers on the Internet.  If it is known that all communicating
   parties for a particular communication, including destination hosts
   and any routers in the path, are capable of supporting more than the
   baseline then these default limits may be freely exceeded.

              </t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="Internet-Draft" value="draft-ietf-6man-eh-limits-13"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC9098">
          <front>
            <title>Operational Implications of IPv6 Packets with Extension Headers</title>
            <author fullname="F. Gont" initials="F." surname="Gont"/>
            <author fullname="N. Hilliard" initials="N." surname="Hilliard"/>
            <author fullname="G. Doering" initials="G." surname="Doering"/>
            <author fullname="W. Kumari" initials="W." surname="Kumari"/>
            <author fullname="G. Huston" initials="G." surname="Huston"/>
            <author fullname="W. Liu" initials="W." surname="Liu"/>
            <date month="September" year="2021"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document summarizes the operational implications of IPv6 extension headers specified in the IPv6 protocol specification (RFC 8200) and attempts to analyze reasons why packets with IPv6 extension headers are often dropped in the public Internet.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9098"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC9098"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7974">
          <front>
            <title>An Experimental TCP Option for Host Identification</title>
            <author fullname="B. Williams" initials="B." surname="Williams"/>
            <author fullname="M. Boucadair" initials="M." surname="Boucadair"/>
            <author fullname="D. Wing" initials="D." surname="Wing"/>
            <date month="October" year="2016"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Recent RFCs have discussed issues with host identification in IP address-sharing systems, such as address/prefix-sharing devices and application-layer proxies. Potential solutions for revealing a host identifier in shared address deployments have also been discussed. This memo describes the design, deployment, and privacy considerations for one such solution in operational use on the Internet today that uses a TCP option to transmit a host identifier.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7974"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7974"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC8547">
          <front>
            <title>TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option</title>
            <author fullname="A. Bittau" initials="A." surname="Bittau"/>
            <author fullname="D. Giffin" initials="D." surname="Giffin"/>
            <author fullname="M. Handley" initials="M." surname="Handley"/>
            <author fullname="D. Mazieres" initials="D." surname="Mazieres"/>
            <author fullname="E. Smith" initials="E." surname="Smith"/>
            <date month="May" year="2019"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>Despite growing adoption of TLS, a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a STARTTLS command) by which to convey support for encryption, thus making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded and therefore require a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="8547"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC8547"/>
        </reference>
        <reference anchor="RFC7609">
          <front>
            <title>IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) Protocol</title>
            <author fullname="M. Fox" initials="M." surname="Fox"/>
            <author fullname="C. Kassimis" initials="C." surname="Kassimis"/>
            <author fullname="J. Stevens" initials="J." surname="Stevens"/>
            <date month="August" year="2015"/>
            <abstract>
              <t>This document describes IBM's Shared Memory Communications over RDMA (SMC-R) protocol. This protocol provides Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) communications to TCP endpoints in a manner that is transparent to socket applications. It further provides for dynamic discovery of partner RDMA capabilities and dynamic setup of RDMA connections, as well as transparent high availability and load balancing when redundant RDMA network paths are available. It maintains many of the traditional TCP/IP qualities of service such as filtering that enterprise users demand, as well as TCP socket semantics such as urgent data.</t>
            </abstract>
          </front>
          <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="7609"/>
          <seriesInfo name="DOI" value="10.17487/RFC7609"/>
        </reference>
      </references>
    </references>
    <?line 754?>

<section numbered="false" anchor="acknowledgments">
      <name>Acknowledgments</name>
      <t>Thanks to Paul Aitken, Eric Vyncke, and Joe Touch for the reviews and comments. Special thanks to Andrew Feren for sharing data about scans of IPFIX data he collected.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Wesley Eddy for the tsvart review, Yingzhen Qu for the opsdir review, Dirk Von Hugo for intdir review, Joel Halpern for the genart review, and Tero Kivinen for the secdir review.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Thomas Graf for the Shepherd review.</t>
      <t>Thanks to Mahesh Jethanandani for the AD review.</t>
    </section>
  </back>
  <!-- ##markdown-source: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-->

</rfc>
